Consumer materials
Screen accessible plastics, metals, coatings and formulations.
UNITED STATES / CHEMICAL EXPOSURE AND WARNINGS
Assess California Proposition 65 at the level that matters: potential human exposure. Connect chemical screening, use conditions and warning decisions, with consistent information across product packaging, online sales and the supply chain.

YOUR MARKETUnited States
YOUR FOCUSChemical exposure and warnings
OUR APPROACHConnected compliance support

01 / THE BIG PICTURE
California Proposition 65 concerns exposure to listed chemicals associated with cancer or reproductive harm and restrictions on discharges into drinking-water sources. For consumer products, the key question is whether a warning is required for the anticipated exposure, not simply whether a laboratory detects a listed substance.
There is no official Proposition 65 product approval certificate. A defensible approach combines knowledge of the product, relevant chemical information and a documented exposure or warning decision. The assessment should remain specific to the marketed construction and foreseeable use.
Explore the requirements02 / WHERE IT APPLIES
Start with your product’s intended use and category. Here are some of the applications covered in this service.
Screen accessible plastics, metals, coatings and formulations.
Consider relevant transfer and use-related exposure evidence.
Connect material information with the actual exposure scenario.
These are examples. The applicable route depends on your product specifications and target market.
03 / THE PATH FORWARD
Move from the first assessment to a documented compliance plan, with clear responsibilities and evidence for your product.
Identify plausible listed chemicals and evidence gaps.
Connect test data with product use and relevant levels.
Document the warning or no-warning basis.
Align channels, partners and future product changes.
One connected workflow, with your product at the center.
Create your product brief04 / EXPLORE THE DETAILS
Open a topic for guidance on scope, requirements, documentation and practical considerations.
6 topics in this guide
Review the current OEHHA list against materials, formulations and production information. Focus on plausible chemical sources rather than testing every product for an undifferentiated list. Supplier documentation can guide targeted analysis, but its scope must match the component, formulation and revision actually supplied.
Define who uses the product, how frequently, for how long and through which routes exposure may occur. Consider the accessible material and its behaviour during expected use. Concentration results alone do not establish daily exposure; an assessment may require migration, release or other use-specific information.
OEHHA publishes safe-harbour exposure levels for some listed chemicals. These are not universal concentration limits for materials. Where a relevant level is absent, the business may need another properly supported assessment of the anticipated exposure. Review the applicable exemption and evidence before deciding a warning is unnecessary.
When a warning is needed, review the current rules for its content and delivery method. Requirements differ across product and exposure contexts. Updated short-form warning provisions took effect in 2025 with a transition period; existing artwork should therefore be checked against the applicable manufacture and implementation provisions.
Agree how chemical and warning information passes from manufacturer to importer, distributor and retailer. Identify who controls online listings and private-label artwork. A warning supplied in a technical email will not help customers if the retail team cannot associate it with the correct model and sales channel.
Track formulation changes, supplier substitutions, new intended uses and list updates. A decision for one exposure scenario should not automatically be applied to a different product format. Keep the screening rationale, analytical data, assessment and warning decision together so future reviews start from a clear record.
Try “testing”, “documents” or “process”.
Requirements vary by product, intended use and market. Confirm the applicable standards and current regulatory route before proceeding.
05 / A LITTLE MORE CLARITY
Practical answers to common questions about Prop 65 Compliance.
No. The applicable exposure and legal provisions must be assessed; presence alone is not the complete decision.
No. Safe-harbour values concern exposure and vary by chemical and endpoint.
No. Proposition 65 warnings do not establish compliance with other restrictions or safety requirements.
Review the amended rules and transition provisions before relying on existing artwork.
LET’S PLAN WHAT’S NEXT
Turn your product details and ambitions into a clear starting point.
Create my product briefService marks and organization names identify the standards and regulatory topics discussed. They do not indicate certification of, affiliation with, or endorsement of Complise Global.